LOPEZ et al v. 1716 I, LLC
| JESSICA HINTON, YODIT YEMANE, ARIANNY CELESTE LOPEZ, BRENDA GEIGER, CARISSA ROSARIO, CLAUDIA SAMPEDRO, JANET GUZMAN, JENNIFER ZHARINOVA, JESSA HINTON, MONICA LEIGH BURKHARDT, ROSA ACOSTA, STEPHANIE RAO, URSULA MAYES and JODIE JOE |
| 1716 I, LLC doing business as EDEN LOUNGE |
| 1:2025cv00896 |
| March 26, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SEALED DOCUMENT filed by ROSA ACOSTA, STEPHANIE RAO, URSULA MAYES, YODIT YEMANE, ARIANNY CELESTE LOPEZ, BRENDA GEIGER, CARISSA ROSARIO, CLAUDIA SAMPEDRO, JANET GUZMAN, JENNIFER ZHARINOVA, JESSICA HINTON, MONICA LEIGH BURKHARDT(This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.)(Golaszewski, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 1716 I, LLC with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11569779) filed by JENNIFER ZHARINOVA, STEPHANIE RAO, CARISSA ROSARIO, JESSICA HINTON, MONICA LEIGH BURKHARDT, BRENDA GEIGER, URSULA MAYES, ARIANNY CELESTE LOPEZ, CLAUDIA SAMPEDRO, ROSA ACOSTA, YODIT YEMANE, JANET GUZMAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-L, #2 Summons Request of issuance, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Golaszewski, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
