Fealy v. United States of America, et al.
| JOHN ROBERT FEALY |
| UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, dba Elain Dean Curry for Kristina L. Lincoln, DAVID A. HUBBERT, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY |
| 25-104 |
| January 7, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Attorney Paul Andrew Allulis as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Andrew W. Amend. [Entered: 02/25/2025 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Paul Andrew Allulis for Appellee David A. Hubbert, Appellee United States Department of the Treasury, Appellee United States Internal Revenue Service, Appellee United States of America replacing Andrew W. Amend. [Entered: 02/25/2025 11:24 AM] |
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. (Richard A. PAEZ, Jay S. BYBEE, Eric D. MILLER) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [Entered: 01/27/2025 02:48 PM]
|
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant John Robert Fealy. [Entered: 01/23/2025 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of change of address filed by Appellant John Robert Fealy. [New address already on docket.] [Entered: 01/23/2025 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 6 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellant John Robert Fealy is filed. Original and 5 copies. [Entered: 01/21/2025 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant John Robert Fealy. [Entered: 01/21/2025 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorney Andrew W. Amend as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Samuel Holt. [Entered: 01/14/2025 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew W. Amend for Appellee David A. Hubbert, Appellee United States Department of the Treasury, Appellee United States Internal Revenue Service, Appellee United States of America replacing Samuel Holt. [Entered: 01/14/2025 05:35 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 2/18/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 3/18/2025. For appeal no. 25-104, 4:24-cv-01825-YGR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/07/2025 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:24-cv-01825-YGR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-104 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/07/2025 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
