Raymond Greenwood, et al v. Mepamsa SA, et al
| RAYMOND GREENWOOD and TASHA GREENWOOD, husband and wife, individually and on behalf of their minor children, M.G. and A.G., as assignees of U.S. Catalytic Corporation, a California corporation, and Camco Manufacturing, Inc., a North Carolina corporation |
| MEPAMSA SA, a Spanish corporation, XL INSURANCE SWITZERLAND, a Swiss corporation, XL INSURANCE AMERICA INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and XL REINSURANCE AMERICA INSORPORATED, a New York corporation |
| 12-17292 |
| October 15, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Raymond Greenwood, et al v. Mepamsa SA, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant,: RAYMOND GREENWOOD | |
| Represented By: | Robert L. Greer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant,: TASHA GREENWOOD, husband and wife, individually and on behalf of their minor children, M.G. and A.G., as assignees of U.S. Catalytic Corporation, a California corporation, and Camco Manufacturing, Inc., a North Carolina corporation | |
| Represented By: | Robert L. Greer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: MEPAMSA SA, a Spanish corporation | |
| Represented By: | Randy Jiro Aoyama |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: XL INSURANCE SWITZERLAND, a Swiss corporation | |
| Represented By: | Darrell S. Dudzik |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: XL INSURANCE AMERICA INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation | |
| Represented By: | Robert J. Romero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation | |
| Represented By: | Darrell S. Dudzik |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: XL REINSURANCE AMERICA INSORPORATED, a New York corporation | |
| Represented By: | Robert J. Romero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
