Jay Maloney v. FCA US LLC, et al
Plaintiff: Jay Maloney
Defendant: DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and FCA US LLC
Case Number: 8:2020cv00639
Filed: April 2, 2020
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E Scott
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING Order to Show Cause (Doc. #15 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton: FCA had failed to include in its Notice of Removal the citizenship of every one of its owner/member entities, rendering its assertion of citizenship insufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction. On 5/28/2020, FCA replied, providing the Court with the missing information. (Doc. #18 .) Accordingly, the Court DISCHARGES the Order to show cause. (jp)
May 28, 2020 Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, re Response #18 served on 5/28/2020. (Gregg, Michael)
May 28, 2020 Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Defendant FCA US LLCto Order to Show Cause, #15 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities)(Gregg, Michael)
May 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No. 2 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Case is ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than March 26, 2021. (tg)
May 27, 2020 Filing 16 CIVIL TRIAL ORDER for cases assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton. (tg)
May 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: It is ORDERED to show cause, in writing (one to two pages), no later than five (5) days from the date of this Order, why the Court should not remand the case to Orange County Superior Court. Failure to timely respond will result in immediate remand. (jp)
May 22, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff failed to file A Notice of Interested Parties pursuant to Local Rule 7-1.1 concurrently with its initial filing (Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Report #12 ). Plaintiff must file a Notice of Interested Parties no later than **Wednesday, May 27, 2020.** THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
May 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTES (In Chambers) SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference set for hearing 5/22/2020, is VACATED and the following schedule is set. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/28/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION). (jp)
May 8, 2020 Filing 12 JOINT REPORT of RULE 26(f) REPORT filed by Plaintiff Jay Maloney. (Lim, Jeeho)
April 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference is set for 5/22/2020 at 10:30 a.m. See attached Order for details. (tg)
April 7, 2020 Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg)
April 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:20-cv-00639-JLS-KESx. (jgu)
April 3, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
April 3, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa)
April 2, 2020 COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant FCA US LLC. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 5)(esa)
April 2, 2020 COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Jay Maloney, upon Defendant FCA US LLC served on 3/5/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 3) (esa)
April 2, 2020 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, FCA US LLC, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Jay Maloney. (filed in state court 2/25/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (esa)
April 2, 2020 Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, re Notice of Appearance #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #5 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Appearance #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 4/2/2020. (Gregg, Michael)
April 2, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, identifying FCA North America Holdings, LLC; FCA Holdco B.V.; Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, N.V.. (Gregg, Michael)
April 2, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michael J Gregg on behalf of Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company (Gregg, Michael)
April 2, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michael J Gregg on behalf of Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company (Gregg, Michael)
April 2, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. (Gregg, Michael)
April 2, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2020-01134432-CU-BC-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-25944495 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Gregg Decl, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F) (Attorney Michael J Gregg added to party FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company(pty:dft))(Gregg, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jay Maloney v. FCA US LLC, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Represented By: Michael J Gregg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FCA US LLC
Represented By: Michael J Gregg
Represented By: Mark W Skanes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jay Maloney
Represented By: Christopher Michael Lovasz
Represented By: Jeeho Henberwithz Lim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?