Gonzalez v. LendingClub Bank, N.A. et al
| Adrian Gonzalez |
| LendingClub Bank, N.A., Capital One Bank USA N.A., Credit One Bank, N.A. and Trans Union LLC |
| 2:2025cv04084 |
| May 7, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Adrian Gonzalez. (Enns, Nicholas) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Adrian Gonzalez. (Enns, Nicholas) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Adrian Gonzalez. (Enns, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Adrian Gonzalez. (Enns, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Adrian Gonzalez, identifying Unknown. (Enns, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Adrian Gonzalez. (Enns, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-39655810 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Adrian Gonzalez. (Attorney Nicholas J Enns added to party Adrian Gonzalez(pty:pla))(Enns, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
