Julie A. Su v. Pink Cactus Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Julie A. Su
Defendant: Min Joung Lee Sung and Pink Cactus Corporation a California corporation doing business as Bucketlist
Case Number: 2:2025cv00192
Filed: January 8, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Patricia Donahue
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Percy Anderson. APPLICATION of Attorney Karina E. Wegman-Schaaff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Julie A. Su, designating Marc A. Pilotin as local counsel is GRANTED.; granting #4 Non-Resident Attorney Karina E. Wegman-Schaaff. (aco)
January 13, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
January 13, 2025 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Min Joung Lee Sung, Pink Cactus Corporation. (jtil)
January 13, 2025 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
January 13, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
January 13, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (jtil)
January 8, 2025 Filing 4 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Karina Wegman-Schaaff to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Julie A. Su (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Not Required for US Government Attorney) filed by Plaintiff Julie A. Su. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Pilotin, Marc)
January 8, 2025 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Julie A. Su. (Pilotin, Marc)
January 8, 2025 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Julie A. Su. (Pilotin, Marc)
January 8, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff Julie A. Su. (Attorney Marc A Pilotin added to party Julie A. Su (pty:pla))(Pilotin, Marc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Julie A. Su v. Pink Cactus Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Min Joung Lee Sung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pink Cactus Corporation a California corporation doing business as Bucketlist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julie A. Su
Represented By: Marc A Pilotin
Represented By: Karina E Wegman-Schaaff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?