Jackson et al v. Exactech Inc et al
| Jaryel Jackson and Ivona Jackson |
| Exactech Inc doing business as Exactech and Exactech US Inc doing business as Exactech |
| 4:2023cv01182 |
| December 13, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 E-MAIL received from Eastern District of New York confirming the case was received and opened in their district as case number 1:24-cv-00121. (kbc) |
| Filing 2 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-44) transferring this case to the U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York as part of MDL No. 3044 In Re: Exactech Polyethylene Orthopedic Products Liability Litigation. Signed by the Clerk of the Panel Tiffaney D. Pete.(jak) |
| Docket Note: Pursuant to #2 Conditional Transfer Order, this case was transferred to the U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York as part of MDL No. 3044 In Re: Exactech Polyethylene Orthopedic Products Liability Litigation on this date. (jak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Jaryel Jackson, Ivona Jackson against All Defendants. (Fee $405, Receipt Number LIT4616.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
