City of Irondale, Alabama, The v. 3M Company Inc et al
| City of Irondale, Alabama, The |
| DuPont De Nemours Inc, EIDP Inc, Corteva Inc, Chemours Company, The, Daikin America Inc, Scholar Craft Products Inc, E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, 3M Company Inc, Tricon Wear Solutions LLC, GCP Applied Technologies Inc and Chemours Company FC LLC, The |
| 2:2024cv01327 |
| September 27, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Anna M Manasco |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 40 REPLY to Response to Motion re #37 MOTION to Stay re #3 MOTION to Remand Motion to Stay Consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Pending the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's Final Decision Whether to Transfer This Case to the IN RE AFFF MDL<, #38 MOTION to Expedite Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Reply in Support of Motion to Stay and Response to Motion for Expedited Hearing on Motion for Remand filed by 3M Company Inc. (Radney, W) |
| Filing 39 RESPONSE in Opposition re #37 MOTION to Stay re #3 MOTION to Remand Motion to Stay Consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Pending the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's Final Decision Whether to Transfer This Case to the IN RE AFFF MDL< filed by City of Irondale, Alabama, The. (Conn, Matthew) |
| Filing 38 MOTION to Expedite Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand by City of Irondale, Alabama, The. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Conn, Matthew) |
| Filing 37 MOTION to Stay re #3 MOTION to Remand Motion to Stay Consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Pending the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's Final Decision Whether to Transfer This Case to the IN RE AFFF MDL by 3M Company Inc. (Radney, W) |
| Filing 36 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 MOTION to Remand Sur-Reply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by 3M Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Radney, W) |
Filing 35
TEXT ORDER: The court GRANTS in part Defendant 3M Company, Inc.'s motion, Doc. #34 , to the extent 3M Company, Inc. shall file its sur-reply, Doc. [34-1], as a separate docket entry on or before NOVEMBER 15, 2024. The motion, Doc. #34 , is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 11/13/2024. (AKD)
|
| Filing 34 MOTION to Strike #28 REPLY (other) 3M Company's Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for Leave to File Sur-Reply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand by 3M Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 3M's Sur-Reply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand)(Radney, W) |
| Filing 33 RESPONSE in Support re #27 MOTION to Strike #3 MOTION to Remand 3M's Motion to Strike Declaration of Charles B. Andrews filed by 3M Company Inc. (Radney, W) |
| Filing 32 NOTICE of Appearance by William H Morrow on behalf of 3M Company Inc (Morrow, William) |
| Filing 31 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob Miller Salow on behalf of 3M Company Inc (Salow, Jacob) |
|
Filing 30
TEXT ORDER: Any reply in connection with the motion to strike, Doc. #27 , shall be filed on or before NOVEMBER 8, 2024. If appropriate, the court will set a hearing on the motion to remand, Doc. #3 , and the motion to strike, Doc. #27 , by separate order. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 11/01/2024. (AKD)
|
| Filing 29 RESPONSE to Motion re #27 MOTION to Strike #3 MOTION to Remand 3M's Motion to Strike Declaration of Charles B. Andrews filed by City of Irondale, Alabama, The. (Conn, Matthew) |
| Filing 28 REPLY to re #3 Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion to Remand filed by City of Irondale, Alabama, The. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Conn, Matthew) |
| Set Deadlines as to #27 MOTION to Strike Declaration of Charles B. Andrews. Reply due by 11/8/2024. (AKD) |
| Filing 27 MOTION to Strike #3 MOTION to Remand 3M's Motion to Strike Declaration of Charles B. Andrews by 3M Company Inc. (Radney, W) |
| Filing 26 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 MOTION to Remand Defendant 3M's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by 3M Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Radney, W) |
|
Filing 25
TEXT ORDER: The court GRANTS Defendant 3M Company, Inc.'s unopposed motion for leave to excess pages, Doc. #24 . Defendant 3M Company Inc. may file an opposition to the motion to remand of no more than thirty pages. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 10/25/2024. (AKD)
|
| Filing 24 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages 3M Company's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limitations in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand by 3M Company Inc. (Radney, W) |
| Filing 23 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by 3M Company Inc.(Radney, W) |
|
Filing 22
TEXT ORDER: The court GRANTS Defendant Scholar Craft Products, Inc.'s motion for an extension of time, Doc. #21 . Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 10/17/2024. (AKD)
|
| Filing 21 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading by Scholar Craft Products Inc. (Turner, D) |
|
Filing 20
TEXT ORDER:Any response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #3 , must be filed on or before OCTOBER 28, 2024. Any reply must be filed on or before NOVEMBER 11, 2024. To conserve resources and promote judicial efficiency, the court will not enter a briefing schedule for any motion to dismiss, nor resolve any motion to dismiss, during the pendency of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #3 . Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 10/07/2024. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 19
TEXT ORDER: The court GRANTS Defendant 3M Company, Inc.'s unopposed motion for an extension of time, Doc. #15 . Any responsive pleading by Defendant 3M Company, Inc. must be filed on or before OCTOBER 25, 2024. On October 3, 2024, Defendant Daikin America, Inc. filed a motion for an extension of time to respond to the Plaintiff's complaint. Subsequently, on October 4, 2024, Defendant Daikin America, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss, #13 . As such, the court DENIES Defendant Daikin America, Inc.'s motion for an extension of time, Doc. #10 , as moot. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 10/07/2024. (AKD)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Solomon Schae Thomas on behalf of Chemours Company FC LLC, The, Chemours Company, The, Corteva Inc, DuPont De Nemours Inc, E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company (Thomas, Solomon) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Lana Alcorn Olson on behalf of Chemours Company FC LLC, The, Chemours Company, The, Corteva Inc, DuPont De Nemours Inc, E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company (Olson, Lana) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss (CORRECTED) by Daikin America Inc. (Estes, Allen) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #3 MOTION to Remand. Responses due by 10/28/2024 Replies due by 11/11/2024. (AKD) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: 3M Company Inc answer due 10/25/2024. (AKD) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Unopposed Motion by 3M Company Inc. (Radney, W) |
| Filing 14 Case Reassigned to Judge Anna M Manasco. Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala no longer assigned to the case. (CLC) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss by Daikin America Inc. (Estes, Allen) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Chemours Company FC LLC, The, Chemours Company, The, Corteva Inc, DuPont De Nemours Inc, E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company. (Johnson, John) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala recused. The undersigned directs the Clerk of Court to randomly reassign this case. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on October 4, 2024. (Haikala, Madeline)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and/or to Toll Time to Respond Pending Resolution of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand by Daikin America Inc. (Estes, Allen) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT: The parties having not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, the above styled civil action has been randomly reassigned to the Honorable Madeline Hughes Haikala. Please use case number 2:24-cv-1327- MHH on all subsequent pleadings. Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden no longer assigned to the case. (KNS) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason B Tompkins on behalf of Daikin America Inc (Tompkins, Jason) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Allen M Estes on behalf of Daikin America Inc (Estes, Allen) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Jones Flachsbart on behalf of Daikin America Inc (Flachsbart, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher L Yeilding on behalf of Daikin America Inc (Yeilding, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 Brief re #3 MOTION to Remand . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Conn, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Remand by City of Irondale, Alabama, The. (Conn, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by 3M Company Inc. (KNS) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 405, receipt_number AALNDC-4690144. related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by 3M Company Inc from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, case number 01-cv-2024-903343. (), filed by 3M Company Inc.(KNS) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/30/2024: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet) (KNS, ).. (Radney, W) Modified on 9/30/2024. ALND Rec # B-13958 (KNS). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by 3M Company Inc from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, case number 01-cv-2024-903343. (), filed by 3M Company Inc.(KNS) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/30/2024: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (KNS, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
