Louisiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 271
Anderson v. Arceneaux
as 5:2025cv00343
Plaintiff:
**SANCTIONED/BARRED* Jermaine Anderson
Defendant:
Tom Arceneaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Arceneaux
as 3:2025cv00343
Plaintiff:
**SANCTIONED/BARRED* Jermaine Anderson
Defendant:
Tom Arceneaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Shreveport Bossier Rescue Mission
as 5:2025cv00302
Defendant:
Shreveport Bossier Rescue Mission
Plaintiff:
**SANCTIONED/BARRED* Jermaine Joseph Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rester v. Covenant House New Orleans
as 2:2025cv00378
Plaintiff:
Holden Rester
Defendant:
Covenant House New Orleans, Rhemeisha Roberson, Shawne Favre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caffee v. Sims et al
as 5:2025cv00173
Plaintiff:
Alisha M Caffee
Defendant:
Sheva M Sims, Aspen Apartments and City of Shreveport City Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blanche v. Monroe Housing Authority
as 3:2024cv01747
Defendant:
Monroe Housing Authority
Plaintiff:
Sandra B Blanche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vallot et al v. CST Multifamily Group, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01006
Defendant:
The Palms at Juban Lakes Louisiana, LLC and CST Multifamily Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vallot and Semaj Vallot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bodner v. Johnson et al
as 5:2024cv01716
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Bodnar
Defendant:
Carlos Alberto Villavicencio, IV, Samuel Johnson and Karen P Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02528
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Title III Americans with Disabilities Act
Evans
as 3:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Sandrena Renee Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
