California Torts - Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 14,562
rosen v. katie
as 3:2025mc80099
Plaintiff:
Ann Rosen
Defendant:
eleccion katie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Heavey v. Does 1-100 et al
as 3:2025cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Heavey
Defendant:
Does 1-100 and WinCup, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Vinson Investments LLC v. Matthew Browar et al
as 2:2025cv03843
Plaintiff:
VINSON INVESTMENTS LLC
Defendant:
MATTHEW BROWAR, LAWRENCE HERSHFIELD, MICHAEL GLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
P.B.1 et al v. PowerSchool Group LLC et al
as 3:2025cv01074
Plaintiff:
P.B.1, P.B.2 and P.B.3
Defendant:
PowerSchool Group, LLC and PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pd Diversity-Property Damage
Vickery v. Empower Finance, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv03675
Plaintiff:
Samuel Vickery
Defendant:
Empower Finance, Inc. d/b/a Empower
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Marija Andesilic et al v. Newell Brands Inc.
as 2:2025cv03736
Plaintiff:
Marija Andesilic and Passion Lowe
Defendant:
Newell Brands Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gremmels v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv03722
Plaintiff:
Christian Gremmels
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Asmian, Verizon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Paul de Ayora v. Inspire Brands, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv03645
Petitioner:
Benjamin Paul de Ayora
Respondent:
Inspire Brands, Inc. and Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pemberton v. Restaurant Brands International, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv03647
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pemberton
Defendant:
Restaurant Brands International, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International US Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cheslow v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
as 3:2025cv03655
Plaintiff:
Linda Cheslow
Defendant:
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
