California Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 44,654
Kostroun v. Weekly Spiral LLC
as 3:2025cv04073
Plaintiff:
William Kostroun
Defendant:
Weekly Spiral LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Oppenheimer v. Santa Cruz Mountains Winegrowers Association
as 5:2025cv04083
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Santa Cruz Mountains Winegrowers Association
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Comet ML Inc. v. Perplexity AI, Inc.
as 3:2025cv04088
Plaintiff:
Comet ML Inc.
Defendant:
Perplexity AI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Howarth v. Need for Build, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv01209
Plaintiff:
Morgan Howarth
Defendant:
Need for Build, Inc., Hila Almog and Danny Almog
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Agence France-Presse v. Northstar Financial Consulting Group Inc et al
as 2:2025cv04270
Plaintiff:
Agence France-Presse
Defendant:
Northstar Financial Consulting Group Inc and Does 1 through 10 inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
James Fortune v. Glam House Group, Inc.
as 2:2025cv04241
Plaintiff:
James Fortune
Defendant:
Glam House Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Flated LLC v. I3 Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv04257
Plaintiff:
Flated LLC
Defendant:
I3 Enterprises, Inc. and Meyer Distributing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Textnow, Inc. v. AtlasV, Inc.
as 3:2025cv04044
Plaintiff:
Textnow, Inc.
Defendant:
AtlasV, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
PAYNEARME, INC. v. SUBSTRING LLC
as 5:2025cv04064
Plaintiff:
PAYNEARME, INC.
Defendant:
SUBSTRING LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Rigsby v. Tu Tiempo Digital Inc
as 2:2025cv04179
Plaintiff:
Aaron Rigsby
Defendant:
Tu Tiempo Digital Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
