Sixth Circuit Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,959
United States of America v. Currency $808,880.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2025cv11315
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency $808,880.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Griffin v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 2:2025cv11267
Plaintiff:
Lonnie L. Griffin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States of America v. One Hundred Seventy Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars ($170,835.00) in United States Currency et al
as 3:2025cv00220
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Hundred Seventy Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars ($170,835.00) in United States Currency and Real Property Located at 2411 Omaha Lanes, Louisville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $378,625.12 USDT IN CRYPTOCURRENCIES SEIZED FROM BINANCE USER ID 201812576
as 2:2025cv00064
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$378,625.12 USDT IN CRYPTOCURRENCIES SEIZED FROM BINANCE USER ID 201812576
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. One 2016 Black Infiniti Q 50, VIN JN1FV7AP9GM420961, with All Appurtenance and Attachments Thereon et al
as 2:2025cv02411
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One 2016 Black Infiniti Q 50, VIN JN1FV7AP9GM420961, with All Appurtenance and Attachments Thereon
Claimant:
Percy Woodears and James Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CONTENTS OF BANK OF AMERICA, ACCOUNT NO. X4630, IN THE NAME OF JIANGUO ZHENG et al
as 3:2025cv00104
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CONTENTS OF BANK OF AMERICA, ACCOUNT NO. X4630, IN THE NAME OF JIANGUO ZHENG, CONTENTS OF JP MORGAN CHASE, ACCOUNT NO. X6151, IN THE NAME OF TORF REPAIR INC., CONTENTS OF BANK OF AMERICA, ACCOUNT NO. X7917, IN THE NAME OF X&Y INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324 Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Currency Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) in U.S. Currency
as 2:2025cv10809
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. Currency $3,840,772.58 US Dollars, et al
as 25-1202
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY $3,840,772.58 US DOLLARS CONSTITUTING 125 INTERNATIONAL WIRE TRANSFERS SEIZED FROM U.S. CORRESPONDENT BANK, CITIBANK
Appellant:
ADVOTIS GENERAL TRADING, LLC
United States of America v. 4,340,000 Tether ("USDT") Cryptocurrency valued at approximately $4,340,000, formerly associated with cryptocurrency address beginning/ending 0xa17 . . . 44f0021 et al.
as 1:2025cv00386
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
4,340,000 Tether ("USDT") Cryptocurrency valued at approximately $4,340,000, formerly associated with cryptocurrency address beginning/ending 0xa17 . . . 44f0021, 3,290,000 Tether ("USDT") Cryptocurrency valued at approximately $3,290,000, formerly associated with cryptocurrency address beginning/ending 0x4e5 . . . d47abb5 and 577,578 Tether ("USDT") Cryptocurrency valued at approximately $577,578, formerly associated with cryptocurrency address beginning/ending 0xafd . . . b2378a5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. 2020 BMW M340i bearing Vehicle Identification Number ending 8B41143, et al
as 1:2025cv00225
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2020 BMW M340i bearing Vehicle Identification Number ending 8B41143, $77,674.95 from Bank of America account ending 1022 and $107,764.76 from JP Morgan Chase Bank checking account ending 6211 and JP Morgan Chase Bank brokerage account ending 1571
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
