U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Scholl, et al v. Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, et al
as 25-5053
Plaintiff:
ERIC F. SCHOLL, individually and as parent and next friend of J.J.S.J, a minor child, JACQUELINE R. SCHOLL, individually and as parent and next friend of J.J.S., a minor child and J. J. S., a minor child
Defendant:
WALGREENS SPECIALTY PHARMACY, LLC, DBA Alliance Rx Walgreens Prime and WALGREENS SPECIALTY PHARMACY HOLDINGS, LLC, a foreign company
McClaflin v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S., et al
as 24-1194
Plaintiff:
GINA MCCLAFLIN
Defendant:
SANOFI--AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI--AVENTIS U. S. LLC, d/b/a Winthrop U.S., SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC., f/k/a Sanofi--Aventis U.S., Inc and others
Ditto, et al v. Sanofi U.S. Services, Inc., et al
as 24-1184
Plaintiff:
LOIS Y. DITTO and CHARLES E. DITTO
Defendant:
SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC., FKA Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Inc. and SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC
Cowen v. Walgreen Co.
as 23-5003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBECCA COWEN
Defendant / Appellee:
WALGREEN CO., an Illinois corporation, DBA Walgreens Drugstore No. 15751
Kester v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals
as 22-7026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA RENEE KESTER
Defendant / Appellee:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cherokee Nation v. CVS Pharmacy, et al
as 22-7010
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE CHEROKEE NATION
Defendant / Appellant:
CVS PHARMACY, INC., OKLAHOMA CVS PHARMACY, LLC, WALMART STORES, INC. and others
Smith v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 17-3057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON COMPANY and JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Watson v. Mylan Pharmaceutical
as 17-3019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARMEN NAOMI WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Watson v. Mylan Pharmaceutical
as 16-3349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARMEN NAOMI WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
